Are The Lotr Movies Better Than The Books

(lord of the rings is one novel, not a trilogy.) of course, any adaptation has to change the story, and, in a story as long as lotr, leave things out. The return of the king:

Not All Who Wander Are Lost Lord of the Rings Movie Book

Lotr suffers for it, i suspect.

Are the lotr movies better than the books. Read the books kids the show didn't do them justice. The lord of the rings: The departure of boromir minas tirith:

For over a decade, lord of the rings fans have been comparing the books and the movies. No, the book is better than the movies. Tolkien 's book the fellowship of the ring and the peter jackson film screenplay of the same name are fairly easy to document because, in both the book and film, the story maintains a single thread from beginning to end.

(lord of the rings is one novel, not a trilogy.) of course, any adaptation has to change the story, and, in a story as long as lotr, leave things out. And wouldn't you know the library only had in the tt, starting my long running theme of. The books are better, but in my opinion they are more targeted towards adults then the movies were.

Lord of the rings books vs. It has a higher awesomeness/time ratio. But the bbc radio series did a better job.

They took everything i loved about the books and distilled it into its pure essence. Books are better than movies because of limited time. The witcher games are better than got and lotr, but books are meh with shit peace and neflix series is horrible.

There is a lot in lotr that just couldn't be made into a good movie, imo. The passing of the grey company: The shadow of the past:

While there are some changes in sequence, the storyline is well aligned between the two sources. The fellowship of the ring: You can read at lunch or while you have a.

Id say the lotr books is alot better, they have so much depth and lore behind them that is lacking in hp. But the bbc radio series did a better job. Movies why i prefer lotr movies.

However it wa a great read and certainly a masterpiece of fantasy (in addition, when it was written, character personalities weren't that. Lacking somewhat in the book. You read at your own pace and in your own time.

When you read a book, you might take a day, a week, a month, two months or several months to finish it. The movie of the fellowship of the ring vastly simplifies the start. This is a really deep book that can be very complicated in places, as tolkiens attention to detail is simply staggering.

I felt the characters were. I read the books when i was young. And i must admit, the hobbit movies damaged my psyche, i try to blank them from my memory.

No, the book is better than the movies. The plot moves along better, they packed in more action, and the big thing: So far lord of the rings is the only time i felt the movie was better than the book.

There is alot of information that is really cool to learn, but it is truly an entire universe so if ur going to read the books my reccomendation would be to get really involved its more fun that way (the hobbit films are a whole different thing though, ugh.) The harry potter movies are better, maybe in part due to.

The movies are already aging for me, the books are still the books.i get jacksons changes to the story, screenwriting demands it, but i didnt love all the acting and dialogue and whatnot. The movie of the fellowship of the ring vastly simplifies the start. The hobbit films look equally awesome, though erebor was a little surreal compared to everything seen in the lotr films up to this point.

The books are so tonally different and i think the movies did the best job they could finding a balance between source and mainstream. Other than the hobbit and the lord of the rings, tolkien really has not published much else. But the lotr movies were better than shitty got.

I'll chime in on loving both. A short cut to mushrooms: 5.overall what is your favorite.

the shrinking librarian The hobbit movies, The hobbit